A fascinating Jewish perspective, reviewing the history of Jewish interpretation of the firmament. From the article:
The Torah describes God’s fashioning the firmament (רקיע) on the second day of creation. This piece of the universe, however, doesn’t actually exist—a problem obfuscated in my yeshiva education…Every pre-Copernican commentator in Judaism who wrote about the rakia knew exactly what it was. The Talmud, for instance, records varying opinions about the thickness of what is clearly a solid firmament; from the seven layer firmaments of Resh Lakish (b. Chagigah 12b), to the two firmaments of R Judah (ibid.), from the finger-width firmament of Rav Joshua ben R Nehemia (Gen. Rab. 4:5), to the “50 year journey” firmament of Rav Judah (j. Berachot 2c).
Source: My Encounter with the Firmament – TheTorah.com
We have written a fairly lengthy article on the meaning of the expression “very good” in Genesis 1. Suffice it to say we believe the phrase means everything was really good. From the sea, to the trees, to the serpent and even humanity, the whole work of creation was a job well done. While the component parts may have been good, the work collectively was very much more so. There is no moral or superhuman overtones to the phrase in the context of Genesis 1 or in its many uses later in the Old Testament. Continue reading
This interesting page reviews Jewish readings of Genesis 1 and in this article by Dr. Rabbi Zev Farber focuses on the distinction between light on Day 1 and the Sun on Day 4 of creation. To quote an extract from the article: Continue reading
Although the text appears quite simple, our community’s conflicting views on Genesis 1 prove the shifting sands of Christadelphian interpretation cannot be relied on; we have never arrived at an interpretation with which we can all agree. Even the apparently simple description of the creation of man is sufficiently ambiguous that brother Roberts said it is unclear how it actually happened. Continue reading
While there is a fair amount of material on Genesis 1 on this blog, much of it is pointing out limitations in some readings rather than addressing the text as it is. There is some fantastic material (and not so great stuff as well) around.
Bro David Brown has an interesting and well reasoned series of articles on his blog here. COD maintains the literality of the serpent (along with the special creation of Adam and Eve), however despite some differences there is a lot of value in David’s well reasoned work.
In July 2017 The Lampstand Magazine included a unfortunate and inaccurate insert on evolutionary creation. This post deals with their astray commentary on Gen 1-3 in the insert table. Below is a preproduction of their table on Gen 1-3 with a simple repudiation underneath Continue reading
For more detail see this post.