Category Archives: BASF & CCA

The first and last Adams

20819538_1659499300726933_1971092894723932813_o

1 Cor 15 is obviously relevant to Paul’s Adam/Christ comparison.  Some of the language is picked up in the BASF.  However we should observe what Paul is saying rather than push the comparison further. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under 1Cor15, BASF & CCA

How to read fellowship statements

Foundation Clause

Obviously I believe the Scripture doesn’t rule out EC.  The argument is made that EC is inconsistent with the BASF.  On one hand this is clearly less significant than being inconsistent with Scripture, however the BASF is an important document underpinning our fellowship.  As Brethren Carter & Cooper noted “To decry a Statement as man-made and to speak of the Bible as alone sufficient reveals a marked failure to perceive the problems of ecclesial life and its duties[1]

It is a useful definition of our faith as Bro Roberts commented on the value of a statement of faith saying

So long as it is understood that the written definition is not an authority, but merely the written expression of our identical convictions, there is not only no disadvantage, but the reverse, in reducing the faith to a form that shuts the door against misunderstanding[2] Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under BASF & CCA

A response to the IEAC Creation Statement

In late 2015, a group of ecclesias in South Australia (mainly those affiliated with The Lampstand Magazine) issued a statement trying to restrict how our various statement of faith documents should/could be understood.  The following blog comprehensively demonstrates the edicts flaws.  Very unfortunate that the rebuttal has been ignored by the various arranging groups it was provided to.  ieaccreationstatement.blogspot.com.au

Leave a comment

Filed under BASF & CCA, Lampstand Magazine & IEAC

A dangerous inconsistency and false charge

In endeavouring to argue against EC, brethren (for it is mainly brethren) can readily express extremes which are inconsistent with both their position and the position of our community more generally.  A classic example is the relationship between science and Scripture and then extrapolating this into commentary about the inspiration of Scripture.  It is true enough that there is a relationship with inspiration, as is set out above.  However these balance is lost in debate and comments such as below are made: Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under BASF & CCA, Lampstand Magazine & IEAC, Science & scripture